I understand these are noncombatant troops, but this could very easily be a smaller step toward larger action. Vietnam started with advisors.
Is sending more military the right choice for the situation?
And what exactly does a promise of "no boots on the ground" mean? Does that mean no troops? No combat troops? Should that president break that commitment?
http://m.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29961084
No comments:
Post a Comment